JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 5, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ana Maria Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Recusacion Formulada Por La Ciudadana Ana Maria Ramirez Contra El Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria. Rechaza Por Impertinente La Recusacion Formulada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recusacion De Magistrado De La Corte Constitucional
  • Intervinientes están legitimados para solicitarla
  • No configuración de la causal de interés directo
  • Divulgación por medios de comunicación de concepto inserto en comunicado de prensa de la Corte Constitucional
  • No constituye causal la invitación a personas y entidades que según el recusante tendrían una posición determinada en proceso de constitucionalidad
  • Orden impartida en relación con fecha de vencimiento de fijación en lista y traslado al Procurador General de la Nación
  • Salvamento o aclaración de voto no constituye causal
3 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por impertinente la recusacion formulada por la ciudadana Ana Maria Ramirez, contra el Magistrado Jaime Araujo Renteria a que se ha hecho referencia en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. El original de esta providencia incorporese al expediente D-6122, al cual fueron acumulados los expedientes D-6123 y D-6124.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.